TradingVerdict
Head-to-head comparison

FundingPips vs FTMO: Which Forex Prop Firm Is Better?

FundingPips and FTMO are two of the most popular forex/CFD prop firms, but they win on different things — price and payout speed versus the longest, most proven track record. Here is the honest breakdown.

By the TradingVerdict deskUpdated

The short answer

Both are legitimate forex/CFD prop firms, and neither offers CFDs to US retail clients. FTMO (since 2015) is the benchmark: a strict two-step evaluation, up to a 90% split, four platforms and the most documented payout history. FundingPips (since 2022) is cheaper (entry from ~$29), pays faster (within ~24 hours), splits up to 100% and has a huge 4.5-Trustpilot review base. Choose FundingPips for value and speed, FTMO for the most proven record.

FundingPips vs FTMO, side by side

FeatureFundingPips logoFundingPipsFTMO logoFTMO
Founded2022 — newer, but grown into one of the largest firms2015 — the longest, most documented track record
Evaluation model1-Step, 2-Step, 2-Step Pro, or Zero instant fundingTwo-step: FTMO Challenge then Verification
Entry priceAmong the cheapest — a 2-Step Pro starts around $29One-time challenge fee per size, refunded on first payout
Profit splitUp to 100% (most challenges ~90%, Zero ~95%)Up to 90% on a funded FTMO Account
Payout speedTypically within ~24 hours, bank or USDCReliable on a published schedule (not 24-hour)
Instant fundingYes — the Zero program skips the challengeNo — you must pass the two-step evaluation
PlatformsMT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLockerMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, DXtrade
Reputation~4.5 Trustpilot across 32,000+ reviews, $260M+ paid (firm-reported)The benchmark name; longest documented payout history
US clients acceptedNo — CFD products are not available to US retailNo — FTMO does not accept US-based clients
Best forValue, fast payouts, a high split and an instant-funding optionTraders who want the single most proven, flexible all-rounder

Price, evaluation and instant funding

On cost, FundingPips is among the cheapest quality firms — a 2-Step Pro challenge starts around $29, with 1-Step, 2-Step and Zero instant-funding routes from $5K to $200K. FTMO charges a one-time challenge fee per account size, but it is refunded on your first payout, so a passed FTMO account is very good value too.

The structural difference is the route in. FTMO offers a single, consistent two-step path (Challenge then Verification). FundingPips gives you four ways in, including a true instant-funding program for confident traders who want to skip the evaluation entirely — something FTMO does not offer.

Profit split, payouts and reputation

FundingPips edges the headline numbers: splits run up to 100% (versus FTMO’s up-to-90%), and payouts are fast, typically processed within 24 hours by bank transfer or USDC. Its review base is enormous — ~4.5 on 32,000+ Trustpilot reviews — and it reports $260M+ distributed since 2022.

FTMO’s advantage is proven longevity. As the firm that effectively defined the modern prop model (since 2015), it has the longest documented payout history in the space. We have not tested either firm’s payouts ourselves, so we report these as the public record — but on track-record depth, FTMO is still the reference point.

Platforms, and who each suits

Platform choice slightly favours FTMO: MT4, MT5, cTrader and DXtrade versus FundingPips’ MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader and TradeLocker. If you specifically need MetaTrader 4, FTMO is your firm; otherwise both cover the mainstream forex/CFD stack.

Pick FundingPips if you want the best value, the fastest payouts, a 100% split or an instant-funding option. Pick FTMO if you want the most proven all-rounder, MT4 support, or a refunded fee. Both restrict US retail clients on CFDs — US traders should look at a futures firm instead.

FundingPips vs FTMO: FAQ

01FundingPips vs FTMO — which is better?
For most traders, FundingPips offers better value: cheaper entry (from ~$29), faster ~24-hour payouts, splits up to 100% and an instant-funding option, backed by a 4.5 Trustpilot score across 32,000+ reviews. FTMO is the better pick if you want the longest documented track record (since 2015), MT4 support and a refunded fee. Both are legitimate, and neither serves US retail on CFDs.
02Is FundingPips cheaper than FTMO?
Generally yes. A FundingPips 2-Step Pro challenge starts around $29, among the cheapest in the space. FTMO charges a higher one-time fee per size, but refunds it on your first payout — so a passed FTMO account effectively costs nothing. Compare current prices and discounts before buying.
03Which has the higher profit split?
FundingPips, on paper: it offers up to 100% (most challenge accounts land near 90%, Zero instant around 95%), versus FTMO’s up-to-90%. Confirm the exact split for your specific plan, since both firms vary it by program and payout preference.
04Do FundingPips or FTMO accept US clients?
No. Neither offers CFD products to US retail clients, which is standard for forex/CFD prop firms. US-based traders should consider a futures-focused prop firm such as Topstep or Apex instead. Always verify current eligibility on each firm’s own site.
05Which pays out faster?
FundingPips. It typically processes payouts within 24 hours via bank transfer or USDC, subject to meeting the consistency and minimum-day rules. FTMO pays reliably on its published schedule but is not a 24-hour firm.
AdSee FundingPips plans
Visit