TradingVerdict
Head-to-head comparison

Elite Trader Funding vs Topstep: Which Futures Firm Wins?

Elite Trader Funding and Topstep are both futures prop firms open to US traders, but they sit at different ends of the spectrum: ETF on cheap, flexible entry; Topstep on the longest track record and the most proven payouts.

By the TradingVerdict deskUpdated

The short answer

Both are legitimate futures prop firms open to US traders. Elite Trader Funding is cheaper, with six evaluation models, broad platform support and frequent discounts — but a $25,000 sim payout cap and a stricter consistency rule. Topstep is the most established futures firm (since 2012), with clean, well-documented rules, a verified payout history and 100% of your first $10,000 then 90% on a monthly subscription. For payout reliability and track record, Topstep wins; for cheap, flexible entry, ETF.

Elite Trader Funding vs Topstep, side by side

FeatureElite Trader Funding logoElite Trader FundingTopstep logoTopstep
FoundedEstablished, large user base2012 — one of the longest track records in futures
Evaluation modelSix models (1-Step, EOD, Static, Fast Track, Diamond Hands, DTF)Trading Combine, then an Express Funded Account
PricingAmong the cheapest; frequent discountsMonthly subscription (from ~$49/mo with promos)
Profit split100% of first $12,500, then 90%100% of first $10,000, then 90%
Payout cap before live$25,000 sim cap, then a live 80/20 accountNo equivalent cap — funded payouts continue
Rules clarityFlexible, but a stricter consistency-style loss ruleClean, transparent, well-documented rules
Track recordEstablished and popularThe benchmark — documented payouts we have seen verified
PlatformsNinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, TradingView, QuantowerTopstepX, NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower
US clients acceptedYes — futures, open to US tradersYes — futures, open to US traders
Best forCheap, flexible entry and model choiceTrack record, payout reliability and clean rules

Price and evaluation

Elite Trader Funding competes on price and flexibility: very cheap entry, frequent discounts, and six models so you can pick trailing, end-of-day or static drawdown, a fast cheap shot or a no-evaluation route. Topstep runs a monthly subscription (from around $49/mo with promos) on a clear two-stage path — pass the Trading Combine, then trade an Express Funded Account.

The cost shapes differ: ETF rewards picking the right model and timing a discount; Topstep rewards passing quickly, since the subscription adds up month over month. If you value a single clear path and proven structure, Topstep; if you want options and the lowest upfront cost, ETF.

Split, payout caps and reliability

The splits are close — both pay 100% early then 90%, with Topstep’s early band at $10,000 and ETF’s at $12,500. The bigger difference is the $25,000 sim payout cap at ETF, after which you move to a live 80/20 account; Topstep has no equivalent cap and keeps you on the funded model.

Where Topstep pulls ahead is reliability. It is the benchmark for documented, transparent payouts in futures prop trading, with the longest track record (since 2012) and notably clean rules. ETF is established and pays many traders, but its stricter consistency rule and live-account transition add complexity. For a decision that hinges on getting paid predictably, Topstep is the safer bet.

Platforms, and who each suits

Both share NinjaTrader, Tradovate and Quantower; Topstep adds its own TopstepX, while ETF adds TradingView and Rithmic. If you trade from TradingView, ETF is the one; if you want Topstep’s native platform and ecosystem, Topstep.

Pick Topstep for the most proven track record, clean rules and reliable payouts. Pick Elite Trader Funding for the cheapest, most flexible entry, model choice or TradingView support. Both are open to US traders.

Elite Trader Funding vs Topstep: FAQ

01Elite Trader Funding vs Topstep — which is better?
Topstep wins for most traders on track record and payout reliability — it is the most established futures firm (since 2012), with clean, documented rules and a proven payout history. Elite Trader Funding is the better pick for cheap, flexible entry: six evaluation models, frequent discounts and TradingView support, though it has a $25,000 sim payout cap and a stricter consistency rule. Both are legitimate futures firms open to US traders.
02Is Topstep worth the monthly subscription?
It can be if you value a proven, transparent firm and pass reasonably quickly, since the subscription adds up the longer you take. Topstep’s long track record and documented payouts justify a higher cost for many traders. ETF’s cheaper, discount-heavy entry suits those optimising purely for upfront cost.
03Which has the better profit split?
They are close — both keep 100% early then 90%. Topstep’s 100% band covers your first $10,000; ETF’s covers your first $12,500. The bigger difference is ETF’s $25,000 sim payout cap, which Topstep does not have.
04Are both open to US traders?
Yes. Both are futures prop firms trading CME products, so they are available to US traders — unlike forex/CFD prop firms, whose products are not offered to US retail clients.
05Which platforms do they support?
Both support NinjaTrader, Tradovate and Quantower. Topstep adds its native TopstepX; Elite Trader Funding adds TradingView and Rithmic. If TradingView matters to you, ETF is the more flexible choice.
AdSee Elite Trader Funding plans
Visit