The short answer
E8 Markets vs FundedNext, side by side
| Feature |  E8 Markets |  FundedNext |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation model | Several models — E8 Account (two-step), E8 Track (one-step), Elev8 (scaling) | Several models — Evaluation, Express, Stellar (one/two-step variants) |
| Headline pricing | One-time fee per model/size; low entry on small accounts | One-time fee per model/size; low entry on small accounts |
| Discount frequency | Frequent promotions on evaluation fees | Frequent promotions on evaluation fees |
| Profit split | High — up to around 80–100% depending on model/tier | Up to around 90%, plus profit earned during the challenge |
| Challenge-phase profit | Not a headline feature | Yes — earn a share of profit during the challenge phase |
| Payout reputation | Markets heavily on fast payouts; held up in our testing | High volume of funded traders; paid within the published window |
| Drawdown type | Daily + max loss limit, defined per model; rules seen as flexible | Daily + max loss limit, defined per model |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader |
| US clients accepted | No — restricted in several countries, including the US | No — restricted in several countries, including the US |
| Best for | Traders who want high splits, fast payouts and TradingView | Traders who want flexible models, low cost and challenge-phase profit |
Two model-rich firms, closely matched
Both firms reject the single-path approach. E8 Markets offers the E8 Account (two-step), E8 Track (faster, single-phase) and Elev8 (built around scaling). FundedNext offers Evaluation (two-step), Express (faster) and Stellar (one- and two-step variants). In each case you can match the route to your speed, budget and risk appetite.
The flip side is complexity: at both firms the targets, loss limits and payout terms differ between models and are easy to confuse. Read the rulebook for the specific model you buy rather than assuming terms carry across — that is the most common pitfall for new traders at either firm.
Splits, payouts and the challenge-phase perk
E8 Markets advertises high splits — up to around 80–100% depending on model and tier — and markets itself heavily on fast payouts. Funded traders report withdrawals arriving quickly and in line with the published schedule, so that claim holds up.
FundedNext advertises up to ~90% and counters with its standout feature: you can earn a share of profit during the challenge phase, which partly offsets the upfront fee — something E8 does not headline. Funded traders report clean payouts from both. As always, confirm the current split, minimum threshold and schedule for your specific model before withdrawing.
Platforms: TradingView vs cTrader
This is the clearest practical difference. E8 Markets supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and TradingView — the TradingView option is a modern touch many rivals lack and a real draw for chart-driven traders. FundedNext supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and cTrader instead.
If TradingView is part of your workflow, E8 has the edge; if you prefer cTrader, FundedNext does. Both cover the standard forex/CFD instruments, so most strategies transfer either way — the platform you are comfortable in is the deciding factor here.
Pricing, rules and track record
Both charge a one-time fee rather than a subscription, both have low entry points on their smallest accounts, and both run frequent promotions — so on raw cost they are closely matched. Always check current pricing before buying, as discounts and terms change often.
On rules, both apply a daily and maximum loss limit defined per model, with E8’s often described as relatively flexible. On history, both are younger firms (E8 since 2021, FundedNext since 2022), so neither has the multi-year track record of veteran firms — we weight that shorter history accordingly. Read the current rulebook for your chosen plan, since rules evolve.